"$kaycog" (skaycog)
11/11/2013 at 16:24 • Filed to: None | 6 | 12 |
Ford GT40 vs. Ford GT.
ESSSIX GmbH - Accountant/Wagon Thumper
> $kaycog
11/11/2013 at 16:26 | 0 |
GT40 cause it was 40 inches tall wasnt it?
*Yep, thats why...
HammerheadFistpunch
> $kaycog
11/11/2013 at 16:26 | 1 |
I wish I scaled up that gracefully.
Sir Halffast
> HammerheadFistpunch
11/11/2013 at 16:29 | 0 |
Not many can.
MtrRider Just Wants Doritos
> $kaycog
11/11/2013 at 16:32 | 1 |
Next, a Power Wheels version then a Traxxas r/c version, then a model.
$kaycog
> ESSSIX GmbH - Accountant/Wagon Thumper
11/11/2013 at 16:34 | 0 |
Yes, but it was actually 40.5" tall. The GT is 44.3" tall.
NoahthePorscheGuy
> $kaycog
11/11/2013 at 16:37 | 2 |
#ModelBloatGT40Edition
Z_Stig
> $kaycog
11/11/2013 at 16:38 | 0 |
Thankfully they rounded down and not up.....GT41 isn't as sexy sounding.
$kaycog
> Z_Stig
11/11/2013 at 16:41 | 0 |
Also, not sexy is Ford GT44.3.
Z_Stig
> $kaycog
11/11/2013 at 16:48 | 0 |
Definitely not. It's even worse in metric: Ford GT1130. LOL
$kaycog
> Z_Stig
11/11/2013 at 16:57 | 0 |
That is the worst!
desertdog5051
> $kaycog
11/11/2013 at 19:21 | 0 |
Don't know if you remember my post to you about getting to sit in an actual race car when I was in high school. It was so much smaller than I had expected.
$kaycog
> desertdog5051
11/11/2013 at 19:24 | 1 |
I remember you saying that. I'd probably think the same thing.